Dane Sweeny vs Derek Pham Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 10 Aug at 03:57 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Sweeny vs D. Pham

AUS
0
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
0
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Sweeny 0 - 0 Pham
The last match between Dane Sweeny and Derek Pham was at the M15 Brisbane, 10-08-2025, Round: F, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory w/o.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sweeny | 0 |
| Pham | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(F) M15 Brisbane(08-10-25)
D. Sweeny vs D. Pham H2H Profile
D. Sweeny vs D. Pham Match Preview:
- Sweeny has won 44.11% of points on their second serve recently, while Pham edges them out with a 46.23% win rate. Could Pham's slightly better second serve performance be a deciding factor?
- When it comes to returning their opponent's second serve, Pham again leads with 54.63% compared to Sweeny's 49.06%. Does this suggest an edge in the return game for Pham?
- For first serve returns, Sweeny appears stronger, winning 29.22% of these points versus Pham's 22.61%. Will Sweeny's advantage here influence the match outcome significantly?
- Under pressure, Pham has saved 61.11% of breakpoints recently, outperforming Sweeny who has saved 57.34%. Could this calm under pressure give Pham a crucial advantage?
- In the past year, Pham's match win percentage is 64.71%, which surpasses Sweeny's 54.55%. Does this higher win rate make Pham the favorite overall?
- Both players share their best surface performance on Hard courts, with a 59% win rate. Are their equal hard court performances likely to neutralize each other's strengths?
- Sweeny has been more successful on the Futures/Satellites/ITF circuit with a 69.77% win rate, slightly better than Pham's 68.75%. Does this consistency make Sweeny more prepared for this level of competition?
- Sweeny has faced opponents with an average rank of 149.02, while Pham has faced a much lower average rank of 5.12. Might Pham's experience against higher-ranked players offer an edge?
- In deciding sets, Sweeny has a 56% win rate, while Pham boasts a perfect 100% win rate. Could Pham's durability in crucial moments prove decisive?
- Sweeny converts 39.15% of breakpoints, slightly surpassing Pham's 36.84%. Could this superior breakpoint conversion help Sweeny capitalize more effectively on their chances?
Editorial Prediction (August 10, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match showcases two players who have demonstrated strong recent performances, with both having their own areas of strength. Pham slightly edges out Sweeny in second serve performance and their ability to save breakpoints under pressure, implying a potential advantage.
However, Sweeny's ability to convert breakpoints and their slightly better overall win rate in the Futures/Satellites/ITF circuit suggests they know how to emerge successfully at this level of competition.
While both share the same best surface, Pham's robust experience and success rate against higher-ranked opponents might give them the upper hand. Thus, based on their superior performance patterns and handling of critical match situations, Pham is most likely to win this upcoming tennis clash.
Dane Sweeny vs Derek Pham Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
D. Sweeny Recent Matches Played
D. Pham Recent Matches Played

D. Sweeny vs D. Pham Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.69% (234/158) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.77% (58/46) |
| 56.24% (514/400) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.89% (129/106) |
| 52.71% (4516/4052) | Games Win/Loss | 52.08% (1166/1073) |
| 63.41% (201/116) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.24% (53/38) |
| 43.59% (17/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 36.84% (7/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (4/4) |
| 52.94% (9/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 849 | Aces Total | 266 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 1181 | Total Double Faults | 271 |
| 1:39:58 | Average Match Time | 1:30:29 |
| 436.89 | Average Opponent Rank | 436.72 |
| 63% (15992/25473) | 1st Serve % | 62% (3619/5864) |
| 66% (10575/15992) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (2382/3619) |
| 51% (4829/9481) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1037/2246) |
| 43% (1199/2763) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (284/632) |
| 41% (10536/25411) | Return Points Win % | 42% (2371/5711) |
| 46.67% (7/8) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 60.00% (3/2) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 40.83% (49/71) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 70.20% (172/73) | Futures W/L | 57.00% (57/43) |
| 60% (231/388) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (58/102) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (46/98) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 74% (17/23) |
| 64% (81/127) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (16/29) |
| 89% (204/182) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (59/50) |
| 11% (204/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (59/9) |
| 28% (188/52) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (45/8) |